seaxe left Anglo Saxon History

seaxe right


Alfred the Great and the Burghal Hideage AD914

Source


The Burgal Hidage is a collection of a number of medieval texts that describe the location of defensive forts around the state of Wessex during the time of Alfred the Great. The document was named the Burghal Hidage by F. W. Maitland in 1897 after a great deal of research into the subject.

The documents list the major defensive forts anti clockwise around Wessex starting at the unproven location of 'Eorpeburnan' somewhere on the Kent,Sussex or Surrey borders and ending at the last fort in the list at Southwark on the Thames .

The Anglo Saxon word Burgh or more correctly Burh describes a defensive position or fort usually on a hill with a defensive ditch and bank topped with wooden walls and an internal regular layout to help the defenders. These Burhs were mostly built during the reign of Alfred the Great to defend Wessex against the Viking invaders.

Each Burh has a number of hides associated with it, which describes the size of the Burh and its defensive population.


List of Forts

The Burhs listed in the Burghal Hidage were as follows
Eorpeburnan 324 hides
Eorpburnan actually spelt 'eorþ burnan' means the 'earthy stream'
Most likely location is modern Orpington which means 'the earth fort on the hill'
a second alternative is modern Hadlow Down which derives from 'hæƿ hleow dun' and translates to 'the heath refuge on the hill'
Hastings 500 hides
The fort was probably at 'Baldslow down' which derives from 'baels hleow dun' meaning 'the fire refuge on the hill'
Lewes 1300 hides
probably located on mount caburn - Lewes derives from 'hleow aes' which translates to the 'refuge by the river'
Burpham 720 hides
Burpham from 'burþ ham' which translates to 'the fortress settlement in the valley'
Chichester 1500 hides
Chichester derives from 'chyee ceaster' which translates to 'the roman fortress of the Crows'
Portchester 500 hides
Portchester derives from 'port ceaster' which translates to 'the roman fortress with the harbour'
Southampton 150 hides
Southampton derives from 'suþ þam tun' which translates to 'the southern wet place on the hill'
Winchester 2400 hides
Winchester derives from 'win ceaster' which translates to 'the roman fortress of the wine'
Wilton 1400 hides
The most likely location for this fort was at 'Old Sarum' the old Roman fort on the junction of two major Roman roads
Chisbury 700 hides
The most likely location for this fort was at 'Chisbury Camp' an old Iron Age fort
Shaftesbury 700 hides
The most likely location for this fort was at 'Shaftesbury Castle' an old Iron Age fort
Twynam (now called Christchurch, Dorset) 470 hides
The most likely location for this fort was on 'St Catherines Hill' an old Roman signalling station
Wareham  1600 hides
The most likely location for this fort was in Wareham itself
Bridport 760 hides
probably located on Sloes Hill which is likely to be derived from 'eas hloes hyll' which translates to the 'riverside refuge on the hill'
Exeter 734 hides
The most likely location for this fort was the Roman fort in Exeter(Isca)
Halwell 300 hides
The most likely location for this fort was the hill fort at Stanborough Camp
Lydford 140 hides
The most likely location for this fort a fort at Lydford
Pilton 360 hides
The most likely location was an old iron age fort called Roborough Castle who's name could have derived from the Saxon 'hleow borough' meaning the 'old roman fort refuge'
Watchet 513 hides
The most likely location was an old iron age fort called Dawes Castle
Axbridge 400 hides
The fort was probably on 'Callow Hill' which derives from 'Cal hleow Hyll' meaning 'cabbage refuge hill'
Lyng 100 hides
This location must be near Athelney where Alfred the Great fled in 878AD this small fort is most likely located on Burrow mump - which was Burh hleow mump - meaning the new fort refuge on the hill
Langport 600 hides
Meaning the long port as the sea reached here in the times of Wessex. The fort was most likely to be found in the location of Combe quarry but any evidence would be long since removed.
Bath 1000 hides
Malmesbury 1200 hides
Cricklade 1500 hides
Oxford 1400 hides
Wallingford 2400 hides
Buckingham 1600 hides
Sashes 1000 hides
Eashing 600 hides
Southwark 1800 hides
Worcester 1200 hides
Warwick 2400 hides

Size of the Forts
The original starting text reads
To anes æcere bræde on Ɵealstillinge 7 þære Ɵære gebirirgeað. xvi hida Gif ælc hid byþ be anum men gemannod þonne mæg man gesettan ælce gyrde mid feoƟer mannun. þonne gebyreð to tƟentigan gyrdan on Ɵealstillinge. hundeahtatig hida.
This translates to
For one acre breadth of wall-setting & manning is required 16 hides, if each hide is one man, then the manpower to be set for each pole is with four men. Then is required for twenty poles of wall- setting eighty hides.

with the finishing text reading
Gif se ymbegang mara biþ. þonne mæg man eaþe þone ofereacan geþencan of þisse tale for þon ealning to anum furlange gebyreð sixtig manna. 7. c. þonne biþ ælc gyrd mid feoƟer mannum geset
This translates to
If the surrounding is greater, then the manpower can easily be reckoned from this assessing, since there is always required for one furlong breadth sixty men & 100; then each pole is set with four men.

This means that from the first statement:
An acres width of wall(aprox 208ft) needs 16 hides to build - this equates to about 13ft per hide, but this appears to be the construction dimensions.
A pole of wall(16.5 ft) requires 4 defenders and 20 poles requires 80 men, and 1 defender is required for each 4ft of wall which is provided by 1 hide.

Therefore a hide defends 4ft of wall

From the table shown above the Hastings Burh of 500 hides would have a wall of 125 poles so about 2000ft(aprox 610mtrs) of wall which would enclose a 500ft square of land(2.3 hectares) which would have needed 500 men to defend.

wall length
hides ft mtrs sq mtr hectares
Eorpeburnan 324 1296 395 9753 0.98
Hastings 500 2000 610 23226 2.32
Lewes 1300 5200 1585 157006 15.70
Burpham 720 2880 878 48161 4.82
Chichester 1500 6000 1829 209032 20.90
Portchester 500 2000 610 23226 2.32
Southampton 150 600 183 2090 0.21
Winchester 2400 9600 2926 535122 53.51
Wilton 1400 5600 1707 182090 18.21
Chisbury 700 2800 853 45522 4.55
Shaftesbury 700 2800 853 45522 4.55
Twynam (Christchurch) 470 1880 573 20522 2.05
Wareham 1600 6400 1951 237832 23.78
Bridport 760 3040 927 53661 5.37
Exeter 734 2936 895 50052 5.01
Halwell 300 1200 366 8361 0.84
Lydford 140 560 171 1821 0.18
Pilton 360 1440 439 12040 1.20
Watchet 513 2052 625 24449 2.44
Axbridge 400 1600 488 14864 1.49
Lyng 100 400 122 929 0.09
Langport 600 2400 732 33445 3.34
Bath 1000 4000 1219 92903 9.29
Malmesbury 1200 4800 1463 133780 13.38
Cricklade 1500 6000 1829 209032 20.90
Oxford 1400 5600 1707 182090 18.21
Wallingford 2400 9600 2926 535122 53.51
Buckingham 1600 6400 1951 237832 23.78
Sashes 1000 4000 1219 92903 9.29
Eashing 600 2400 732 33445 3.34
Southwark 1800 7200 2195 301006 30.10
Worcester 1200 4800 1463 133780 13.38
Warwick 2400 9600 2926 535122 53.51

Map of the Burghal Hideage Forts
 
Boundary of the Burghal Hideage Forts This Google map shows the location of the forts, we have joined the outer forts to get an approximation of the area that Wessex occupied at this time. See below for a more likely boundary

Map of the probable Boundary of Wessex AD914
 
Map of the probable boundary of Wessex 914AD This Google map shows the most likely boundary for Wessex.



Copyright saxonhistory.co.uk 2013 - 2024
Contact Simon
Author Simon M - Last updated - 2024-03-13 13:16:05
All pages on our site (Sitemap)