|
Saxon viking axe | Anglo Saxon History 
Search Pages |  | |
| Battle of Hastings 1066AD - Q -
Harold`s Route Choice: The Crowborough Convergence |
|---|
| | Introduction ▲ |
|---|
| The Two Possible Routes from London to Battle ▲ |
|---|
|
Harold had two viable routes from London to Battle, both approximately 67 miles. The first was the Rochester Route (Eastern Route): London to Rochester via Watling Street approximately 30 miles, then Rochester south through the Weald via Maidstone, through Staplehurst, Sissinghurst, and Benenden, via Bodiam to Battle approximately 37 miles. Total distance approximately 67 miles. This route uses Roman road M13 (Margary classification) and represents a more easterly approach through the forest.
The second option was the Crowborough Route (Western Route): London to Croydon to Godstone via Roman road, then Godstone to East Grinstead to Crowborough via ridgeway and the London-Lewes road, then Crowborough to Heathfield to Battle approximately 25 miles. Total distance approximately 60 miles. This route uses ridgeway and old trackways through the western edge of Andredsweald and represents a more westerly approach, slightly shorter than the Rochester route.
Key Observation: Both routes traverse the great forest of Andredsweald, but they approach from different angles. The Rochester route enters from the northeast; the Crowborough route runs more directly south along the western portion of the forest.
| | |
|---|
| The Convergence Problem: Wace`s County List ▲ |
|---|
|
Master Wace, writing around 1160, provides this list of counties that sent troops to Hastings:
"Those of London had come at once, and those of Kent, of Herfort, and of Essesse; those of Suree and Sussesse, of St. Edmund and Sufoc; of Norwis and Norfoc; of Cantorbierre and Stanfort; Bedefort and Hundetone. The men of Northanton also came; and those of Eurowic and Bokinkeham, of Bed and Notinkeham, Lindesie and Nichole. There came also from the west all who heard the summons; and very many were to be seen coming from Salebiere and Dorset, from Bat and from Sumerset. Many came too from about Glocestre, and many from Wirecestre, from Wincestre, Hontesire, and Brichesire..."
This is not a list of nearby counties. It includes Gloucester approximately 105 miles from Battle, Worcester approximately 132 miles from Battle, Somerset (Bath) approximately 100 miles from Battle, and Dorset (Salisbury) approximately 110 miles from Battle.
THE CRITICAL QUESTION: How could fyrd on foot from these distant southwestern counties, marching at 17 miles per day, reach Battle by 14th October when they only received the summons on 5th-6th October?
| | |
|---|
| Travel Time Calculations: The Problem with London ▲ |
|---|
|
Using the travel speeds established on Page L (messenger system page), we know that messengers traveled 70 miles per day via relay system, Huscarls (mounted) traveled 40 miles per day, Thanes (mounted) traveled 30 miles per day, and Fyrd (on foot) traveled 17 miles per day.
Scenario 1: All Routes Through London
If we examine Gloucester: News arrives 5 October, distance to London 102 miles, distance London to Battle 67 miles, giving total miles of 169. Days needed for Fyrd would be 9.9 days, meaning they would need to arrive by 3-4 October - which is IMPOSSIBLE as the news hasn't even arrived yet.
For Bath/Somerset: News arrives 5 October, distance to London 114 miles, distance London to Battle 67 miles, giving total miles of 181. Days needed would be 10.6 days, requiring arrival by 3 October - also IMPOSSIBLE.
For Dorset: News arrives 6 October, distance to London 110 miles, distance London to Battle 67 miles, giving total miles of 177. Days needed would be 10.4 days, requiring arrival by 3 October - IMPOSSIBLE.
If all southwestern troops had to route through London, they would need to depart BEFORE the news even arrived. This makes Wace's list factually impossible unless there was another route.
Scenario 2: Direct Route via Winchester to Crowborough Road
For Gloucester: News arrives 5 October, direct route distance is 105-120 miles. Days needed for Fyrd would be 6.2-7.1 days. They could depart after mustering on 6 October and arrive Battle on 12-13 October. This is MARGINAL but POSSIBLE.
For Bath/Somerset: News arrives 5 October, direct route distance is 90-100 miles. Days needed would be 5.3-5.9 days. They could depart 6 October and arrive Battle on 11-12 October. This is FEASIBLE.
For Dorset: News arrives 6 October, direct route distance is 100-110 miles. Days needed would be 5.9-6.5 days. They could depart 7 October and arrive Battle on 12-13 October. This is MARGINAL but POSSIBLE.
Example calculation for Gloucester Fyrd Direct Route: Distance from Gloucester to Battle avoiding London is approximately 105-120 miles, via Gloucester to Cirencester to Winchester, then joining the Crowborough road to Battle. At a travel speed of 17 miles per day, 120 miles divided by 17 equals 7.1 days required. News arrives 5 October based on messenger traveling at 70 miles per day from York. One day for mustering on 6 October. Departure on morning of 6 October. Arrival on evening of 12-13 October. This is JUST IN TIME for the battle on 14 October.
| | |
|---|
| Why the Crowborough Route Creates a Natural Convergence Point ▲ |
|---|
The Strategic Geography
The Crowborough route runs along the western edge of Andredsweald. This creates a natural funnel for troops approaching from the west. First, southwestern fyrd march east from their counties via Winchester. Second, they continue east-northeast on Roman roads toward the area where the London-Lewes road comes south. Third, they intercept Harold's column somewhere in the vicinity of Crowborough, East Grinstead, or further north. Fourth, the combined force then marches south together to Battle.
The Convergence Timeline
On 10 October morning, Harold's column departs London southward while the southwestern fyrd have already been marching east for 4 days. On 11 October, Harold reaches the Godstone/East Grinstead area while southwestern contingents are approaching from the west - this is the first convergence point. On 12 October, Harold reaches the Crowborough area while rear elements are still joining from the west - this is the main convergence zone. On 13 October afternoon, the combined force arrives together near Battle in the Caldbec Hill area. On 14 October morning, the Battle of Hastings begins.
Key Insight: Harold's army was not assembled in London and then marched south as a single unit. Rather, it was a continuously growing force that gathered contingents from multiple directions as it moved toward Battle. The Crowborough route allowed this convergence to happen naturally.
| | |
|---|
| Why the Rochester Route Fails This Test ▲ |
|---|
|
If Harold had taken the Rochester route (the more easterly approach), the southwestern fyrd would face serious problems.
Problem 1: Extra Distance. Southwestern fyrd would need to march further east to intercept the Rochester route. The distance from Winchester to the Rochester area is approximately 75 miles, then south from Rochester to Battle is approximately 60 miles, giving a total from Bath of approximately 135-140 miles versus 90-100 miles via the Crowborough route. This adds 2-3 extra days that the southwestern fyrd did not have.
Problem 2: Wrong Side of the Forest. The Rochester route runs through the eastern portion of Andredsweald. Troops from the west would have to either go around the north of the forest (adding massive distance), or cut directly east through the forest (impossible for large formations).
Problem 3: No Natural Convergence Point. Rochester itself is too far east - southwestern troops would arrive too late. There is no intermediate point where convergence makes sense. The route forces a London assembly, which the timeline cannot support.
Example calculation for Bath Fyrd via Rochester Route: Distance would be Bath to Winchester to northeast to Rochester to south to Battle. Winchester to Rochester is approximately 75 miles, Rochester to Battle is approximately 60 miles, giving a total from Winchester of approximately 135 miles and a total from Bath of approximately 160 miles. Days required at 17 miles per day would be 9.4 days. News arrives 5 October, depart 6 October, arrival date would be 15-16 October. RESULT: Arrives AFTER the battle on 14 October.
| | |
|---|
| Supporting Evidence for the Crowborough Route ▲ |
|---|
1. The "1066 Harold's Way" Modern Commemorative Path
The modern long-distance footpath "1066 Harold's Way" follows a route based on historical research: London to Rochester along Watling Street, Rochester to Maidstone to Staplehurst, then through the Weald to Battle. While this path uses Rochester as a waypoint from London, it still represents the general understanding that Harold used existing trackways through the Weald rather than attempting to blaze a new trail.
2. The Logic of Ridgeways
The Crowborough route follows prehistoric ridgeways that ran along high ground above the forest valleys, were the traditional routes for moving large groups, avoided the worst of the forest density, and were well-known to local populations.
3. Strategic Assembly Points
Historical evidence suggests Harold used strategic assembly points: London as the gathering point for London, Essex, Hertfordshire, and Middlesex troops; the Crowborough area as a convergence point for western and southwestern contingents; and Caldbec Hill as the final assembly point near Battle on 13 October.
4. The Hoar Apple Tree
Chronicles mention the "Hoar Apple Tree" (or "Grey Apple Tree") as Harold's assembly point. This was likely a well-known landmark on the approach to Battle, possibly at or near Caldbec Hill, serving as a final gathering point for contingents arriving from multiple directions. This is consistent with troops converging from both north (London) and west (southwestern counties).
| | |
|---|
| Mounted Troops vs. Fyrd on Foot ▲ |
|---|
|
It's important to note that while the fyrd on foot from distant counties were marginal or late, mounted troops (Huscarls and Thanes) from these same counties arrived with time to spare.
Mounted Troops from the Southwest: Gloucester Huscarls traveling at 40 miles per day could arrive 9-10 October, while Thanes at 30 miles per day could arrive 10-11 October. Either direct route or via London works for them. Bath/Somerset Huscarls could arrive 8-9 October while Thanes could arrive 9-10 October. Worcester Huscarls could arrive 10-11 October while Thanes could arrive 11-12 October. All of these routes work whether direct or via London.
This means Harold's army at Hastings likely consisted of elite mounted troops (Huscarls, Thanes) from across England, including the distant west; Fyrd on foot primarily from southeastern counties (Kent, Sussex, Essex, Surrey, Hampshire); and some western fyrd who arrived via the direct Crowborough route (marginal, but possible).
The Crowborough route was essential not because mounted troops needed it (they could reach Battle via any route), but because it was the ONLY way the western fyrd on foot could arrive in time. Without it, Harold would have had only southeastern infantry.
| | |
|---|
| The Mathematics of Convergence ▲ |
|---|
|
Let us examine the precise calculations that make the Crowborough route necessary.
Given Constants: William lands at Pevensey on 28 September (Day 0). News reaches Harold in or near York on 2 October (Day 4). The messenger network is activated on 2 October. Western counties receive news on 5-6 October via messenger relay. Harold arrives London on 7 October (Day 9). Harold departs London on 10 October (Day 12). The battle occurs on 14 October (Day 16). Fyrd march at 17 miles per day.
Calculation 1: Latest Possible Departure for Western Fyrd. Time available is 14 October (battle) minus 5 October (news arrival) equals 9 days. Minus 1 day for mustering equals 8 days of marching. Maximum distance equals 8 days times 17 miles per day equals 136 miles. Therefore: Any county MORE than 136 miles from Battle cannot send fyrd.
Calculation 2: Distance via London Route. Bath to London is 114 miles. London to Battle is 67 miles. Total is 181 miles. Result: 181 is greater than 136 equals IMPOSSIBLE.
Calculation 3: Distance via Direct Crowborough Route. Bath to Winchester is approximately 30 miles. Winchester to Crowborough area is approximately 50 miles. Crowborough to Battle is approximately 25 miles. Total is approximately 105 miles. Result: 105 is less than 136 equals POSSIBLE with 1-2 days margin.
The mathematics are unambiguous: Without the direct Crowborough route, Wace's list of southwestern counties is physically impossible. The route choice was not optional - it was dictated by the geometry of time and distance.
| | |
|---|
| Alternative Interpretation: Were They All Mounted? ▲ |
|---|
|
Some historians have suggested that the southwestern troops mentioned by Wace were all mounted (Huscarls and Thanes), not fyrd on foot. This would explain their arrival without requiring the Crowborough route. However, several factors argue against this interpretation.
Arguments Against "All Mounted" Theory: First, Wace's language says "those of" each county came, not "the thanes of" or "the mounted men of" - suggesting broader participation. Second, the scale of the battle with contemporary estimates suggesting 7,000-10,000 English troops is far more than could be fielded by mounted elite alone. Third, Harold's urgency - if only elite mounted troops were available, Harold could have waited longer in London for more contingents. His rush south suggests he was gathering infantry as he moved. Fourth, the fyrd system was a national obligation. It would be strange to activate it nationwide but only use mounted troops from distant counties.
Arguments For "Mixed Force" Theory: First, feasibility - the Crowborough route makes western fyrd participation physically possible. Second, numbers - a mixed force of mounted elite plus southeastern and some western fyrd better explains the estimated army size. Third, Harold's strategy of moving south while gathering troops maximizes available forces. Fourth, the geography - the Crowborough route creates a natural convergence that would be wasted if only mounted troops participated.
The most likely scenario is that Harold's army consisted of mounted Huscarls and Thanes from across England who arrived early, heavy contingents of fyrd from southeastern counties who had plenty of time to arrive, some fyrd from western counties who used the direct Crowborough route (marginal but possible), and minimal or no fyrd from the most distant counties like Cornwall, Devon, and the far north.
| | |
|---|
| Implications for the Battle ▲ |
|---|
|
The route choice had direct implications for the composition and readiness of Harold's army.
Army Composition: A core of professional Huscarls, many having fought at Stamford Bridge; strong southeastern fyrd contingent from Kent, Sussex, Surrey, and Essex; mounted thanes from across England; and possible western fyrd contingents who arrived late on 12-13 October.
State of Readiness: Harold's Huscarls were exhausted from the York march of 280+ miles in 11 days. Southeastern fyrd were relatively fresh from their shorter march. Western contingents arrived with minimal rest time. The army had less than 24 hours to organize after final units arrived on 13 October.
Strategic Disadvantages: Harold's rush to engage William created several disadvantages. First, fatigue - core troops were exhausted from the long march. Second, incomplete force - some fyrd were still arriving on the morning of 14 October. Third, no time to prepare - minimal time to organize, provision, or scout Norman positions. Fourth, limited tactical options - forced to fight defensively on ground not fully prepared.
If Harold had waited even 2-3 more days, he could have gathered significantly more fyrd from distant counties. His decision to engage on 14 October suggests he believed speed was more important than numbers - possibly to prevent William from establishing stronger fortifications or moving inland.
| | |
|---|
| Conclusion: The Crowborough Route as Strategic Necessity ▲ |
|---|
|
The evidence strongly supports the conclusion that Harold took the Crowborough route (London-Lewes road via ridgeway) rather than the Rochester route for the following reasons.
1. Mathematical Necessity: The Rochester route makes Wace's county list mathematically impossible. Only the direct Crowborough route allows southwestern fyrd to arrive by 14 October.
2. Geographic Logic: The Crowborough route follows ridgeways through the western edge of Andredsweald, creating a natural funnel for troops approaching from Winchester and the west.
3. Strategic Advantage: The route allowed Harold to maximize his available force by enabling distant counties to contribute, even if only marginally.
4. Historical Consistency: The route is consistent with how medieval armies operated - gathering forces continuously as they moved rather than assembling completely before departing.
Final Assessment: Harold's choice of the Crowborough route was not merely about finding a path through the forest. It was a calculated strategic decision that enabled him to field the largest possible army in the shortest possible time. The route transformed the 67-mile march from London to Battle into a dynamic convergence operation, gathering troops from multiple directions simultaneously.
Without this route choice, the Battle of Hastings would have been fought with a significantly smaller English force - possibly small enough to have changed the outcome. The Crowborough route gave Harold his best chance of victory, even if that chance ultimately proved insufficient.
The Crowborough route was not just the path Harold took - it was the path he HAD to take if he wanted the southwestern fyrd to fight at Hastings.
| | |
|---|
| Further Research ▲ |
|---|
|
This analysis opens several questions for further investigation. Can we identify the precise convergence point where southwestern contingents joined Harold's column? Were there intermediate assembly points along the Crowborough route (East Grinstead, Crowborough itself)? How many western fyrd actually arrived, versus how many were still en route when the battle began? Did Harold send advance riders to guide western contingents to the convergence point? What role did local knowledge of the forest play in enabling this convergence?
Archaeological evidence, place-name analysis, and further examination of chronicle accounts may help answer these questions.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Local Interest
Just click an image |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
![Saxon viking axe](javascript:launch_resize("/images/1066AD/saxon_viking_axe_lft.png",900,1000);)
